<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post1911632621578232717..comments</id><updated>2009-10-07T22:27:51.550-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Top 10 chess: tactical conclusion</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.top10chess.com/feeds/1911632621578232717/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html'/><author><name>chess_planet</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13978268675587340295</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>5</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-1535168003477922042</id><published>2009-10-07T22:27:51.550-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T22:27:51.550-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Great comments, great ideas
1 Qg8+ Kh6
2 Qh8+ Kg5
...</title><content type='html'>Great comments, great ideas&lt;br /&gt;1 Qg8+ Kh6&lt;br /&gt;2 Qh8+ Kg5&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Everybody agrees on that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now A) 3Nd5 3..Rd5!? not over yet&lt;br /&gt;    B) 3h4+! wins&lt;br /&gt;3..Kf4 4Qh6+ and Rd2 will drop.&lt;br /&gt;3..Kh4 4 Qh6! wins ( not 4 Nf5? as noted by one commenter ).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4Qh6! has multiple threats.&lt;br /&gt;on 4..Rf2!? of course 5 Qh2+ wins&lt;br /&gt;but I propose the neat&lt;br /&gt;5 Nf5+!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The idea which didnt work on move 4 now works: 5..ef5 6 Qf4 #.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But that&amp;#39;s not all, there&amp;#39;s a C) variation left !&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can you spot it ?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/1535168003477922042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/1535168003477922042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html?showComment=1254968871550#c1535168003477922042' title=''/><author><name>chess_planet</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13978268675587340295</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='14583023135190249629'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-1911632621578232717' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/posts/default/1911632621578232717' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-3364408656478084361</id><published>2009-10-06T08:58:36.972-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-06T08:58:36.972-04:00</updated><title type='text'>correction again: as I said, after 4..Rf2 it follo...</title><content type='html'>correction again: as I said, after 4..Rf2 it follows 5.Qf4+ Qg4 then &lt;br /&gt;6. Qh2+ and only at the 7th move white wins the queen and the game</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/3364408656478084361'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/3364408656478084361'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html?showComment=1254833916972#c3364408656478084361' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-1911632621578232717' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/posts/default/1911632621578232717' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-250698651483092431</id><published>2009-10-06T08:43:27.742-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-06T08:43:27.742-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I think that after the variation indicated by the ...</title><content type='html'>I think that after the variation indicated by the second Anonymous starting with the 4th move, black can defend with 4.Rf2!; now if:&lt;br /&gt;5.Qf4+ Qg4; 6.fxg4 Rxf4 and black wins; instead if 6.g3+ black can reply with 6..Kh3! threatning to mate on h2.&lt;br /&gt;The right continuation after 2..Kg5is 3.Nd5! and black has to deal with a zugzwang position.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/250698651483092431'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/250698651483092431'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html?showComment=1254833007742#c250698651483092431' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-1911632621578232717' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/posts/default/1911632621578232717' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-3992321789002569494</id><published>2009-10-06T06:24:01.016-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-06T06:24:01.016-04:00</updated><title type='text'>correction: not ok 4.Nf5+ as, after 4..gxf5; 5.g3+...</title><content type='html'>correction: not ok 4.Nf5+ as, after 4..gxf5; 5.g3+ Kg5! and there is no chance for white to win.&lt;br /&gt;More exactly, after 3..Kxh4; 4.Qh6 with double threat: the decisive &lt;br /&gt;5.Qf4+ and the rook on d2 that is under attack; only now if 4..g5? then 5.g3+ Kxh3 (forced) and 6. Qxh5#; else if 4..R (anywhere) 5.Qf4+ Qg4 and white wins the queen and the game</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/3992321789002569494'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/3992321789002569494'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html?showComment=1254824641016#c3992321789002569494' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-1911632621578232717' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/posts/default/1911632621578232717' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-336634316876856936</id><published>2009-10-05T04:09:29.606-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-05T04:09:29.606-04:00</updated><title type='text'>1. Qg8+ Kh6
2. Qh8+ Kg5
3. h4+  Kxh4(if 3..Kf4 the...</title><content type='html'>1. Qg8+ Kh6&lt;br /&gt;2. Qh8+ Kg5&lt;br /&gt;3. h4+  Kxh4(if 3..Kf4 then 4.Qh6+ winning the rook)&lt;br /&gt;4. Nf5+! gxf5(if 4..Kg5 then 5.Qh6+&lt;br /&gt;winning the rook)&lt;br /&gt;5. g3+ Kxh3&lt;br /&gt;6. Qxh5#&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Am I close enough?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/336634316876856936'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/1911632621578232717/comments/default/336634316876856936'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html?showComment=1254730169606#c336634316876856936' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.top10chess.com/2009/10/tactical-conclusion.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4454504925561903590.post-1911632621578232717' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4454504925561903590/posts/default/1911632621578232717' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>